The SN95 firewall is 100% different from a Fox firewall. It was manufactured from completely new tooling, so it makes no sense to assume that anything is the same between them.

From the posts below you can see how different the firewalls are.

http://forums.corral.net/forums/10726338-post143.html

http://forums.corral.net/forums/10405043-post2215.html

Under the dash, things are very different. The brace that holds up the dash near the clutch quadrant is in a different location between the two cars for instance. This is exactly where the mechanism for the Modern Driveline goes under the dash.

 

The SN95 firewall is 100% different from a Fox firewall. It was manufactured from completely new tooling, so it makes no sense to assume that anything is the same between them.

From the posts below you can see how different the firewalls are.

http://forums.corral.net/forums/10726338-post143.html

http://forums.corral.net/forums/10405043-post2215.html

Under the dash, things are very different. The brace that holds up the dash near the clutch quadrant is in a different location between the two cars for instance. This is exactly where the mechanism for the Modern Driveline goes under the dash.

Jack,


Thank you for your response! I'm a huge fan of MM products and have been using them for years. Before I asked this question, I reviewed the MM install instructions for the firewall adjuster and clutch quadrant to see if there were any variations in procedure between Fox and SN95, there were not aside from OEM cable modification.


I get that the Fox firewall only has one cable mounting screw.


I also get that the pedal box assembly is different between Fox and SN95. However, they use the same clutch cable components, so what would prevent using the Modern Driveline setup on an SN95? The only part of their setup that interfaces with the SN95 pedal assembly is the lever arm that mounts to the two quadrant mounting pins. I'm assuming those are the same dimension/location since the aftermarket clutch quadrants fit both model cars.


Pardon my ignorance, I'm just not seeing what the big difference is for this application?

 

Matt,

Some of the features in the firewalls are the same. Such as holes for the clutch cable. Some of the relationships are the same, such as the relationship between the clutch pedal shaft axis of rotation and the clutch cable hole in the firewall.

However, the firewall is made of two different sheets of metal with a flange bent into the piece on the Driver's side. This flange runs up the edge of this piece right next to the hole for the clutch cable. The area around the clutch cable hole is also depressed. Both of these features (flange and depressed area) are built differently on the two different cars. Since the m/c in the Modern Driveline kit mounts to the firewall in the clutch cable hole, the exact dimensions of these features determine how and whether it will fit or not.

In addition to this are the issues under the dash I explained above.

 

Excellent response! I understand what you are saying.

I'm still determined to find non-McLeod hydraulic master solution. Perhaps I will make something custom.

Thank you for your help!

 

Just found this website: 1994 Mustang GT LS1 | GoNicD.com

The guy said he used a turbo coupe pedal assembly and retrofitted an LS1 Camaro master cylinder by putting a new hole in the firewall. Not a bad idea!

 

This is pretty neat!

 

my mcleod hyd TOB, has been problem free, and IMHO a great pedal feel

i think some of the negative feel might have to with not using the mcleod flywheel

i had no issues with bleeding

the kit you linked looks nice though