Ford Mustang Forums banner

BOSS 302 stroked to 347 - DON'T DO IT!

33K views 86 replies 23 participants last post by  indy2000  
#1 ·
:curses:

Start at the beginning.... I bought a used Bosss 302 block off of craigslist.

I read the comments from Woody (ford Strokers) saying it was a bad idea to stroke this block to 347. I also read other posts on YellowBullet from guys saying they had done it with no problems. Also read a post from a Ford Racing tech saying that it was fine to stroke it out that far - Ford had done extensive testing on it. It was also pointed out to me that Ford Racing sold a 347 with the 3.4 stroke and offered a two year warranty on it. So Ford Racing not only said it could be done but stood behind it.

Next step - I talked to my engine builder about it. He told me that most of the 347 engines he builds are a Dart block. But he has built one Boss block 347 and it had no problems. He had no objection to building another and standing behind it.

So the engine was built with Eagle crank and rods and Diamond pistons. On first start up it was fine. Drove it for about 50 miles babying the throttle and keeping it below 3k rpms. All seemed good.

Then it was put on the Dyno. Partway through the first pull it did not sound right - stopped it. At idle you could hear a knock/tick sound. Sounded maybe like a spun bearing - but maybe different. :curses:

The engine builder (same person doing the tune) kept the car to diagnose the problem... His conclusion after removing the oil pan to inspect. It is piston slap.:curses:

Just to add all facts - this is a 352 - not 347 - same thing but bored .060 over instead of .030

We are starting over with a Dart block!
 
#9 ·
How about doing a 60 over 331 set up?
That's an option - but it would mean new crank and pistons. I'm reusing crank and pistons and putting them in the new block. Engine builder said this was better option after discussing both. Cost is comparable without giving up displacement.

I'm buying new block - builder is covering all labor and incidentals for new build. Most parts being reused. I think very fair.
 
#6 ·
Boss302 Block, which is an FRPP block not an old Boss block has shorter piston skirts. Where a stock block has a support casting hanging out below the bore, the Boss 302 block cuts them off. If the fit point is too low on the piston, you will have problems for sure.

These photos are from Fordstrokers.com



Here is the piston that is claimed to be used in the FRPP crate 347 (4.03x3.40) using that block
 
#5 ·
The piston sleeve in the Boss block is shorter then the in the stock block. The bottom of the Piston moves out of the sleeve. According to Ford Racing this is not a problem - it is.

Hopefully somebody with experience can explain that better - I'm only trying to repeat what I'm told.
 
#14 ·
You can read all about the bad (and some good) experiences people have had with the ford racing boss 302 block here,

http://forums.corral.net/forums/5-0-5-8-engine-tech/1726721-331-boss-block-gasp.html

I will state it here as I have in the thread above. I race on a very regular basis. I have 367" boss 302 block engine in my car. It has a Scat forged rotating assy, Diamond 4.145" bore pistons and it's a 28oz balance engine. It has made many 9 second passes since it was built in 2007. This engine has performed flawlessly the entire time. It's consistent, reliable, it doesn't make any strange noises, it doesn't use any oil. It's no different than my stock early 70's block 347 was that I also raced for many years without a single glitch.
I have nothing bad to say about the boss block. I don't understand why so many people are having such problems with these blocks?

Brian
 
#17 ·
I know that many people have had good luck with it. I thought it would work for me. My engine builder built a Boss block with identical parts to mine that is fine. He is perplexed.
 
#16 ·
On first start up it was fine. Drove it for about 50 miles babying the throttle and keeping it below 3k rpms. All seemed good.
Interesting. Did your engine builder tell you to treat it that way?

Just asking because my engine builder told me to give it hell from the start to make sure everything seats and stuff. He told me excessive idling and casual driving wasn't good for breaking it in. I drove it like I stole it for about 150 miles then it went on the dyno for some serious thrashing.

Dean
 
#19 ·
Yes - because the tune was just a best guess for first startup. Didn't want to chance it going lean. The old build had different size injectors so tune was totally different
 
#26 ·
I believe the term for this is not piston slap such as in a cold forged piston before it expands due to heat but actually piston rocking when the whole piston actually "slants" in the bore.

To the op, yea was wondering about the price. I would think a dart block with machining would be more than a new rotating assembly but I don't know your internals or what your machinist/builder is charging either.
 
#28 ·
I was told shortly after the new Boss blocks came out that the cylinders were too short for a 3.4 stroke. Whether it works or not, it's not a good idea. It makes much more sense to start off with a different block. What Ford did, does not make any sense at all, the made the A4 block, the B50 block and the R302 block, those all had common length cylinders. For has never tried to explain why in the hell they did what they did. It really limits what you can do with those expensive blocks.
 
#30 ·
So the engine was built with Eagle crank and rods and Diamond pistons. On first start up it was fine. Drove it for about 50 miles babying the throttle and keeping it below 3k rpms. All seemed good.
ok no piston slap at ANY rpm including idle.



Then it was put on the Dyno. Partway through the first pull it did not sound right - stopped it. At idle you could hear a knock/tick sound. Sounded maybe like a spun bearing - but maybe different.
ok now you have noise from somewhere at idle and possibly at higher rpm.



The engine builder (same person doing the tune) kept the car to diagnose the problem... His conclusion after removing the oil pan to inspect. It is piston slap.
ok, that block csan be bored to 4.125 and you are only at 4.060.

i can positively assure you with 9.999999999% certainty, that your cylinders did not get larger. this means that the block is NOT the cause of the noise.

i would not be satisfied at all with the answer that the block is the problem. it simply makes no sense.
.
 
#39 ·
I agree with the it being piston selection/skirt length ... even in the pictures they were different pistons ... I am no guru on these but I do think if you run the proper skirt length the piston slap issue would be less of a worry ... I think if you went to 331 stroker kit it would be even less with appropriate length skirts/pistons and maybe that is where the success stories are coming from. I agree the Dart is superior in design due to its multiple abilities and combinations on rotating assemblies ... but I don't think the Boss is junk either ... just needs a more specific set up when being stroked. I do like the idea of sleeving the block to achieve the desired length (Costly on top of block and machining) but should make for a really stout foundation as well. Nonetheless good thread ... and this is just my .02
 
#40 ·
Ford Racing engineers had a statement out somewhere where they said the short cylinders were designed that way so you don't have to do any clearance work for a stroker. Dart blocks have the standard length cylinders already notched for a stroker crank. Make a Boss block like that and watch the sales go up. Pic is from Fordstrokers.

Image
 
#63 ·
AND! Dont forget about putting 4 Bolt caps on the front and rear!!!:rolleyes:

if anyone could have done this easly... those Ford :leghump: crack head engineers could have.

imo Ford SCREWED UP with ALL the new "Boss" blocks.

wish i would of never bought a new boss block.
 
#42 ·
I believe the short bore was done to save on and streamline production by removing the extra step of machining the bottom of the bore to clear stroker kits. If so, what seemed like a good idea bit them in the rear.

I personally think an aftermarket block stroker is begging for a 3.5-3.6" stroke crank and 4.125" bore.
 
#60 ·
Yeah. LOL Just like it's always good to skimp on bore length for a rod length, piston pin height, and stroke.

I have a 3.443" crank that will make a nice little buzzsaw as well.
Whimp. Be a man and go 3.5-3.6" stroke.

Bet I could make a practically bulletproof 3.443" stroke FMS Boss block with a custom aluminum rod and custom piston. But, if I were to go custom rod and custom piston, I'd be using a 3.6" stroke crank and the luxury of a factory length bore. Shoot! I'd have to clearance the bottom of eight bores for the stroker!!! Might as well go back to a 3.4" stroke crank rather than deal with making 8 notches in iron. LOL
 
#53 ·
Dart Block here, but you can make a Boss 347 work, but your going pay for the pistons. One I know here, but running it for years 5.40s in the 1/8th not a problem at all. Pretty sure there Diamond Pistons in it