Ford Mustang Forums banner

V8 302 - 300 ~ 330 rwHP

1 reading
6.3K views 22 replies 9 participants last post by  RedMaverick  
#1 ·
Hi guys,

This is my first post in this forum.

I am from Brazil, and I have a fully original ford Maverick 1976 V8 302, sold here with motorcraft bijet carburetor.

I am planning to update my engine. Looking the internet this forum seems to the perfect place to talk about the configuration I am planning to assemble.

The idea is to reach 300 ~330 rwhp.


For fuel, I am thinking about Edelbrock pro flor 4, the kit come with the intake and the injectors, until what I read about this combo kit, I am enjoying, does anyone have used and can tell me more about this system?

For heads, the first idea was to use the Edelbrock E-street even because is easy to find them in Brazil, but I didn’t read good recommendations about this heads, so I turned my eyes to AFR 165 or trickflow wedge 170. I am more point to the trick flow, because is it cheaper than AFS.
Edelbrock is really bad? Do you have any other brand that I should consider in my choice? And about trickflow, is it really good?

For camshaft need to read more, but I am thinking in something about int 22x @ .50in and exh 23x @ .50in.

Any other point that should I consider and read about?
 
#2 ·
I’m not familiar with the fuel injection system, but i posted a few links to give you ideas of 302 builds. There are many ways to reach your goal.



 
#4 · (Edited)
The fuel injection system that he’s looking at isn’t quite like the fuel injection that most efi mustang guys are used to. I think it’s compribale to Chevy’s old TBI system, which is like a carburetor that’s electronically controlled. You don’t have an injector for each cylinder. Instead you get a couple of jets that squirt. That being said, I’d probably stick with a carburetor. The bang for buck probably isn’t there with the efi kit. Also, his 302 is starting with an advertised horsepower rating of 137 crank horsepower. So the 300 rear mark might be a little tougher. The Edelbrock E streets don’t have valve springs, etc, that are strong enough for roller camshafts, but they’re good enough for flat tappet cams. That’s why you don’t see many mustang guys recommending them because latemodel mustangs have roller camshafts. A turbo or supercharger would be the cheapest way to add power, but you might have a hard time finding one for your setup.
For the peanut gallery


Most guys starting with H.O. 302’s that use TFS 170cc type topends make 270-310 rear horse. The H.O. mustangs started with around 200 rear horse so they “only” need another 100 horsepower to reach the 300 target.
 
#5 ·
Edelbrock Performer heads with good valve springs are good heads. I'm not sure what the difference between the E-Street, and the Performer series heads are. I have a set of Performer heads on my car, but on my 331 it only puts out 327 rwhp and 357 lbs of torque. The 170cc heads are a restriction. You don't need a stroker to make that kind of power.

With that said, I personally would not buy any 170cc head and instead invest in the Trick Flow 11r 190. It will offer you up to date technology, and forward thinking for a 302. Trick Flow Twisted wedge heads are great heads, including the 170cc versions, but those are outdated. Saleen S351 Mustangs originally used Edelbrock Performer 170cc heads, but switched to Trick Flow heads because they are a much better flowing design for around the same price.

The Trick Flow 11r 190 heads will give you almost 100 more horsepower than the 170cc Edelbrock heads for around the same price. Plus you'll get better piston to valve clearance for the stock pistons.
 
#8 ·
If you’re able to swing buying link bar style lifters that will Open doors to lots of cam options. The tfs stage 2 is a good off the shelf cam to make 300+ hp. The trickflow 11r is a damn fine head and will allow room to grow later. I’d Go standalone efi any day before using a glorified tbi. That or stick to the carb, a 4 barrel though.
Do you have a general budget in mind?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 90lxwhite
#9 ·
Hi guys,

Yes, we have Ethanol all the county. It is around 110 octanes. And fortunately it is cheaper in the state I live. But the problem in the compression ratio, engines that use Ethanol need to have more compression ratio. Once the bottom of my engine is new, I am not planning to change piston to increase the compression or stroke it, and I didn´t find heads with smaller chambers.

My goal is to have a strong car to drive around with up to date technology in the engine. Torque starting +/-1500 and reaching 6000~6500 maximum.

90lxwhite: The Edelbrock Pro Flo 4, if I am not wrong, has a Victor Junior Intake in the kit, 8 fuel injectors. It is 1000cfm, I don’t know the pressure it is measured, and support until 550 HP according to the description. Seems to be more than I need.


Tjm73: I was looking the Promaxx heads at summit website, and it is almost the same price of Trickflow 11R. What is the Promaxx’s model you are talking about?
What is need change for use H.O. roller cam in my engine? What is the benefit using roller can?


96pushrod: What is the advantage of this link bar style lifters? As I am not planning to sell the car and I don’t have a rush to finish this project I don’t have any l budget in my mind. But would be great do not pass 5k.
 
#11 ·
Promaxx heads are priced per pair. AFR heads are priced each on Summit.

They are not the same class head. The AFR is a better head. The Promaxx head is a budget head. I'm always on a budget so I lean towards budget stuff. The owner of Promaxx was spoken well of by a well-respected member here so I would give them a chance personally.
 
#13 ·
Well if the cheaper head hits the target, what's the loss? Keep nearly a grand in his pocket and still meet his goal. I guess the real question is do you want another 100 hp (or so) or to keep a grand in your pocket? And I'm not convinced that 11Rs will deliver an additional 100 hp on and otherwise the same engine.
 
#14 ·
And the E-street, they are cheaper than Performer rpm and have the same specs...

About budget heads, Promaxx and Procomp? Procomp is easy to find in my country

Comparing Afr165 to 11r 190? The trickflow take much advantage for the bigger intake?


With the importation tax, I found here

Procomp 190cc and E-Street 170cc for almost the same price,

EStreet's price +20% for a Performer rpm 190 or 170cc

EStreet's price + 30% for an AFR165
 
#15 ·
With the E-Street, you will need to upgrade the valve springs. With more affordable heads, the big difference is the valve train hardware. You will hit your horsepower goals with the E-Street, but buy the matching springs for your camshaft.

The biggest complaints about the E-Streets are the valve springs, because the springs will break with a performance camshaft.

The Pro-Maxx has better valve springs, and is 180cc. So you might be better off getting the Pro-Maxx if you don't want to replace the springs. I'm a big fan of the 11R Trick Flow heads, but you might want to try the Pro-Maxx before pulling the trigger on the Edelbrock.

Determine the shipping on the Pro-Maxx vs the Edelbrock. It might make up the difference on replacing the valve springs.
 
#18 ·
I am not planning to use a performance camshaft now, but we never know about the future.... The performance virus bite you, and then you become addicted.. .heheh

So E-street is not in my list anymore.

Have any of you used Procomp? There are many of this heads available in the Brazilian market.


I think this AFR costing 30% more than the E-street seems to be a good choice. My concern now is about the 165cc, is it a future limitation for power?
 
#21 ·
RedMaverick. I have a 150,000 mile, pure stock 302 short block from a 93 Mustang. I put on heads and intake from a bigger engine that I no longer have. I used what I had on hand. I have TFS 11r 205 heads with the big 66cc chambers. With the big chamber and stock short block, my compression is maybe 9:1, could even be less. I have an RPM Air Gap intake and 1 5/8" headers. It has an Anderson B4 cam which is the exact same thing as a TFS Stage 2 cam. It made 321 hp and 300 lb ft of tq on a chassis dyno. Runs good and strong even though people will say the heads are to big, you don't have enough compression, headers are to small - etc......
This build fits right in your requests of 300-330 rwhp. The cam specs are 224/232@ 0.050, .542/.563, 112 LSA
You can meet your goals pretty easily. Keep us posted on your results.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDW6212R