I think the assumption would be the duration at .050 would be more because the valve has more lift it must be getting to .050 sooner, and going below it later.
Because if you take .050 lift and divide it by 1.6 and then multiply it by 1.7 you get .053. So the duration at .050 must be larger by at least the amount of degrees it took to get to from .050 to .053.
So instead of 232@.050 you get 232.003@.050. So technically yes it got bigger.
THE ONLY PROBLEM IS the duration at .050 is of lifter rise not valve distance from the seat, so the rocker arm does nothing. You could have a 1.9 ratio or a 1.3 rato and the lifter rise at .050 is the same.
I think what Jay might be trying to say is while lift does have an impact on piston to valve clearance the bigger issue is cam profile, and timing. If you had .100 clearance with a .490 and a 1.6, going to a 1.7 doesn't mean you end up with .07 directly.