Ford Mustang Forums banner

Speed Density Power Combos

1 reading
7.5K views 55 replies 16 participants last post by  superirish  
#1 ·
I was just given some “Brodix BP ST 5.0 R Series Cylinder Heads CNC Ported” by a friend and was wondering how these would fare on a SD car? So far my 87 Notch has a 306 with mods that include Intake, BBK 70mm Spacer and TB,BBK long tubes,BBK Off Road Cats with X pipe to stainless piping with Borla XR-1’s. Currently running some crap E7 heads that don’t breath for anything and the car still did 251hp and 300+tq at Izzy Performance Dyno in Compton Ca. Now what I wanna know is how some of you SD guys feel this car would do with a Crower 15511 or a Steeda #19 cam and those new heads added?
 
#3 ·
The stock cam isn't horrible with the right supporting components, there's a thread on here for stock cam combos. I ran SD on my 86 just so I could run the vic jr. and 4 hole throttle body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PistolGripSLR
#9 ·
I ran the stock cam because I was using older TW heads on a stock 86 shortblock so had to work with piston/valve clearance issues. With good heads, intake, and exhaust it still made around 335/335 at the wheels, and ran 7.1X@94.XX. I have it set up to run either speed density or mass air, just by swapping processors, and plugging or connecting vacuum to BAP/MAP sensor. I used to run speed density with the B-cam and just tuned it, but for overall driveability it's hard to beat mass air. I think a conversion kit is $50, just have to scare up a processor for it.
What's the code on your speed density processor?
 
#16 ·
I ran the stock cam because I was using older TW heads on a stock 86 shortblock so had to work with piston/valve clearance issues. With good heads, intake, and exhaust it still made around 335/335 at the wheels, and ran 7.1X@94.XX. I have it set up to run either speed density or mass air, just by swapping processors, and plugging or connecting vacuum to BAP/MAP sensor. I used to run speed density with the B-cam and just tuned it, but for overall driveability it's hard to beat mass air. I think a conversion kit is $50, just have to scare up a processor for it.
What's the code on your speed density processor?
I need to check what code it it but I was thinking of running MSPNP later down the line when the funds became available for the dyno time and tuning
 
#10 ·
When I converter my SD car to MAF... it LOST almost 20rwhp... and 2 tenths..

SD timing curve in the computer makes more power than MAF/A9L... needless to say I went back to SD.
If you're just running H/C/I 24# injectors...stay SD.

Ultimately ran H/C/I 24s, and 150 shot and ran low 11s for years on SD... back when 11 second cars were fast!
 
#12 · (Edited)
Off the top of my head I think the WOT spark is similar, can check when I get home, but the SD are richer, and if you're mass air meter is some kind of restriction it'll make a difference too.
 
#14 ·
With what's available today I'd either throw an aftermarket EFI on it or carb it. The fox SD stuff is pretty good but it comes up quick where it's limitations are. Look at the options carefully before blowing $250 on a MAF and $200-300 for an ECU. You're half way to a Holley TermX territory. The cost to pay someone to tune an SD computer would be insane, chip, burn, time, ect.
 
#19 ·
I have a PIMPXS in my turbo Fox, it's still a speed density system. I like it, the support forum is really helpful. The MSPNP is a speed density system too, I've heard its similar to the PIMP and I have also heard the forums are pretty good. If you already have a standalone system in mind, I'd get the nastiest cam that you can get, considering there will be engine management at some point, and a cam swap is basically tearing the engine half apart.

Speed density system is very forgiving. The people that hate on it ain't ever rocked with it. My 85 Marquis has the most preliminary EEC-IV speed density ECM which runs two injectors on a throttle body unit. Everyone on the Marquis forums said that ECM would never handle a head swap or an intake swap or exhaust mods, and we've done all of those things, daily driving still. I'd say just throw what you got at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PistolGripSLR
#20 ·
I'm running SD via PIMPXS on a boosted stock bottom end and cam. The heads and intake are aftermarket. I've ran both MAF and SD on various cars and they both work fine to me. Once it's tuned correctly; I think you'd be hard pressed to see a big difference. Pick your poison and enjoy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PistolGripSLR
#23 ·
Yeah there are lots of SD aftermarket options.. other than pro-m, are there any commonly used aftermarket ECUs that use a MAF?

MS, Pimpxs, fitech and Holley are probably the most common and all of them are SD.
 
#25 ·
Yeah there are lots of SD aftermarket options.. other than pro-m, are there any commonly used aftermarket ECUs that use a MAF?

MS, Pimpxs, fitech and Holley are probably the most common and all of them are SD.
Not that I know of. Even Ford has stopped using MAF's as much. My F150 and Taurus SHO are SD.
 
#24 ·
It's not really SD vs MAF is the question, it's that the SD computer in the fox is ungodly expensive to tune. MS stuff is great too.
 
#27 ·
I think most of it is lack of support for the SD ecus from Ford. I'm sure you could make changes using a QH but unless someone has already broke out the tune definition, it's going to take a lot of work to disassemble and locate all the info to tune it properly.
 
#32 ·
Quarterhorse has the base tune, and a guy named Sailor bob sells a def for $25 lets you datalog with more parameters than the base one that comes with QH.

It's not really SD vs MAF is the question, it's that the SD computer in the fox is ungodly expensive to tune. MS stuff is great too.
Not hard, just time consuming, Leech, and Decipha do it commercially, I'm thinking Pops racing does as well as long as you've got datalogs you can send them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dwain
#38 ·
Knowing how much air is going into an engine seems like a no brainer to me but I also have no real experience with tuning SD setups. My friend is making about 1300 to the wheels with a MAF in a turbo yote. I dont understand why they get so much hate, they work.
 
#43 ·
my maf would not run a cam with vacuum at 16, nor my sd lol...........well it would for a few seconds but as it dropped, it died, but all other rpms actually ran pretty good, i just had to idle at around 900 to keep it from dying at a light, or dying when put in gear so out came the custom ground........as well as maf, waste of money
 
#46 ·
my maf wouldn't do it for some reason, NLOC guys were stumped too.
but it was a custom ground from cam research that had 32* of overlap and was ground to be run on speed density, im sure I could have got pimpx to make it run but i wasn't throwing anymore money at it. so the cam sits on my toolbox, and i guess i'll make a mailbox stand out of it one day
 
#52 ·
Amazing how low of timing they put in the ECU, I always forget they had it tuned to run piss for fuel.
 
#53 ·
Right, they don't get to full advance until 5K RPM too.