Yes, I'm aware there are dozens of threads discussing radiators from the last 20 years, but I'm looking for specific information mostly regarding two rads. One is a thicker, three row Mishimoto and the other is a thinner dual core Griffin. The Mishimoto doesn't have the tube diameter listed for their cores, I would assume it to be 1". I just emailed them to confirm, but I'd wager it's 1" for the Mishimoto - The Griffin is listed as having 1.25" tube diameters.
It's also worth noting that the Mishimoto is marketed as dual pass and is listed as a downflow style radiator while the Griffin is crossflow. I'm also aware that it's generally better to increase a radiator's surface area rather than thickness - The Mishimoto sounds appealing but these factors make me wonder about it's efficiency.
I recently "upgraded" to the standard replacement Mishimoto 2 row aluminum radiator + fan combo in my stock 5.0 and it is unable to keep the temps from climbing in 100+ degree Texas traffic. I've bled the system of all air, turned the fan relay down to the lowest turn on point possible, and tried removing the thermostat, but temps still climb, so something in my system seems like it can't keep up. I'm also considering swapping the Mishi fans to higher CFM SPAL units.
TL;DR - 3 row dual pass thick radiator with 1" tubes VS. 2 row radiator with 1.25" tubes.
Mishimoto 3 Row Dual Pass MMRAD-MUS-79DP - https://www.summitracing.com/parts/mio-mmradmus79dp/make/ford/model/mustang/year/1989
Griffing Performance 2 Row 1.25" tube 8-00165 - https://www.summitracing.com/parts/gri-8-00165/make/ford/model/mustang/year/1989
Price isn't my main concern, though both of these are extremely close in cost. I'd like to put something in that I don't need to worry about or second guess. I want to know from a construction standpoint which of these may perform better/more efficiently, quality or branding isn't my main concern in the sense that I don't believe there's going to be a huge difference in quality between any major brand aluminum rad (if that makes sense). So if you suggest a different brand, please tell me what about the specs are superior.
It's also worth noting that the Mishimoto is marketed as dual pass and is listed as a downflow style radiator while the Griffin is crossflow. I'm also aware that it's generally better to increase a radiator's surface area rather than thickness - The Mishimoto sounds appealing but these factors make me wonder about it's efficiency.
I recently "upgraded" to the standard replacement Mishimoto 2 row aluminum radiator + fan combo in my stock 5.0 and it is unable to keep the temps from climbing in 100+ degree Texas traffic. I've bled the system of all air, turned the fan relay down to the lowest turn on point possible, and tried removing the thermostat, but temps still climb, so something in my system seems like it can't keep up. I'm also considering swapping the Mishi fans to higher CFM SPAL units.
TL;DR - 3 row dual pass thick radiator with 1" tubes VS. 2 row radiator with 1.25" tubes.
Mishimoto 3 Row Dual Pass MMRAD-MUS-79DP - https://www.summitracing.com/parts/mio-mmradmus79dp/make/ford/model/mustang/year/1989
Griffing Performance 2 Row 1.25" tube 8-00165 - https://www.summitracing.com/parts/gri-8-00165/make/ford/model/mustang/year/1989
Price isn't my main concern, though both of these are extremely close in cost. I'd like to put something in that I don't need to worry about or second guess. I want to know from a construction standpoint which of these may perform better/more efficiently, quality or branding isn't my main concern in the sense that I don't believe there's going to be a huge difference in quality between any major brand aluminum rad (if that makes sense). So if you suggest a different brand, please tell me what about the specs are superior.