Ford Mustang Forums banner
1 - 20 of 1555 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
93 Posts
Here is an old quote from jeffo about the current replicas.

4) Polished weighed 29lbs - oe I believe was 27.? so a hair heavier, but also wider on ours so proportional.
These wheels won't be light at all, but what do you expect with the massive chunk of aluminum you'll be getting.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
93 Posts
STREETFIGHTER50, I think you misunderstood me. In my post I was ONLY refering to the centerbore that we all will need on these wheels.

As far as width goes, 8.5" is the ONLY option. Really the only option we do have is the offset and the two sizes that have been thrown out are +26mm & +29.5mm.

Alex, how we gonna decide which offset to go with? FYI the +29.5mm will stick out .14" further than the +26mm.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
93 Posts
Just thinking of listing some pros/cons for each offset we're considering. Any others I’m missing?

+29.5 mm offset pros
Provide more fender clearance for those who use 96+ spindles and/or most aftermarket K-members.
Provide more fender clearance to run a wider (275/40) tire up front.
Help with fender clearance issues especially if you lowered your car over 1.5”.
Provide more REAR fender clearance for those with SN-95 axles and wide tires.

+26 mm offset pros
Help those who plan on widening these wheels.
Help fill the wheel wells for those with near stock Fox length axles (sit closer to the outside).

I don’t think these offsets are a big issue for the rear of our cars, weather you have stock length or SN-95 axles. I think the issue comes down to front fender clearance and widening the rear wheel. Yes, I’d prefer the +29.5, but we can flip a coin for all I care =). I’ll let those with front clearance/widening issues decide what we do and I don’t think the 3.5 mm between the two will really be a show-stopper for either camp. MHO-FWIW
 
1 - 20 of 1555 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top