Ford Mustang Forums banner

402rwhp/359rwtq Stock Short Block 302

3170 Views 65 Replies 24 Participants Last post by  FineLineMtrSprts
2
I put this combo together based on Rock4451's post here 372rwhp Thread I thought it was super impressive for a bolt on 302. Life gets busy and he unfortunately never got it dialed in at the track. I happen to drag race quite a bit so I decided I would try to put one together and see how quick I can go. My previous combo was ported GT40Y's, F303+ cam = 11.86 at 114 354rwhp STD.

I got it on the dyno yesterday and the results blew me away. The TFS 190 11R's and Ed's cam picked up 60 HP at the wheels!(STD) I'll post the SAE smoothing 5 sheet since that is what Rock had posted in his thread(Uncorrected and STD numbers/sheets are in the video). I did not do any tuning, just a couple pulls and the AFR is pig rich. I'll be able to fine tune that at the track. I had looked at the plugs and put in a fresh O2 sensor before the dyno and pulled some jets and it was still rich at about 11.5 AFR across the board.

I've been to the track a few times this year before the dyno and ran a best of 11.58 at 117mph. PB 60' at 1.58. Now the goal is to get the suspension, clutch program, chassis, and me the driver as efficient as possible and see how quick we can go.

Combo:
1968 Torino GT 3260 pounds with driver
Stock explorer 302 short block - stock lifters
FTI custom hydraulic roller cam
TFS 190 11R’s 56cc
Victor JR intake 1 inch open spacer
Holley 650HP
1 5/8" headers - 3” HARM X-pipe and mufflers
MSD ignition
Electric fan - Small crank pulley
Aluminum flywheel and driveshaft
G-Force street T5
9” 4.30’s 31 spline Yukon locker
MT 26 x 10 stiff wall slicks
Calvert 90/10 shocks
Mororo 242# trick springs
Calvert mono leafs and Caltrac bars
Viking double adjustable shocks
Rectangle Slope Font Parallel Plot
Receipt Font Number Pattern Temperature


I started posting some vids on youtube just sharing the process if you're interested. I don't have the personality to carry a channel lol. Just having some fun. Not much out there for Torino content... especially SBF stick car stuff.

Dyno video.

First passes of the year.
See less See more
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 5
1 - 7 of 66 Posts
Add another .015" shim to the pressure plate.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Good Job!!! Too bad they don't make a 1 3/4 header for that chassis, would pick up more suspect.

These guys made the headers for a friend's Boss 302 powered Maverick.

Pretty sure they can build something for the Torino.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
A guy messaged me saying my combo is mismatched and needed a 2.5" exhaust and a dual plane. I've had them and the car has never been faster than it is now lol Posting stuff on the internet gets pretty interesting.
Welcome to my world!

Surprised that one of those "BoobTube" experts hasn't told you that a camshaft over .600" lift is going to cause piston to valve issues. :LOL:
  • Haha
Reactions: 1
This might help the launch. Kill the bog.
Home Depot screen door closer... :LOL:

A real clutch is 1000X better than that POS.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
3
No news there ....
Lighter is always quicker. :cool:

Both these custom built clutch assemblies won many events and set multiple records in heads up class racing...




Black Magic
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Excuse my ignorance... but are you talking about the clutch pressure plate?
RAM Pressure Plate Shim set #550
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Forgive my ignorance here:

I'm a bit confused how OP here, and Rock4451 got such amazing results out of their 302s compared to almost every other dyno result I've seen from HCI. I know that proper parts combinations plays an important role, as does tuning, but most stock bottom 302s I see struggle to crack even 300WHP. These two guys here are 70-100WHP over what I feel like is more common to see. This is all on 93 octane correct?

I also have a hard time thinking it could just be a generously reading dyno, since we have 1/4 slips to back it up. I'm just curious, as part of me is considering building my stock bottom 302 but I'm also concerned it would be a "waste of time" as I'd really only be happy with a minimum of 350+WHP.
Both have one common denominator.....
  • Like
Reactions: 5
1 - 7 of 66 Posts
Top