Are you one of those insufferable people who refuses to call a 302 a 5.0 because pushes up nerd glasses technically it's only 4942cc?Yeah I know about the 332FE engine also. I simply don't like inaccuracies, especially for political reasons. Nobody would ever confuse the 332 stroked 302 with a 332FE engine, except possibly idiots, and I don't make decisions to attempt to satisfy idiots.
I'd edit my post except I can't edit your copy of it.Norm...you don't have much of an idea what you're doing, try not to speak for me.
Your choices are just fine, it's your "facts" that are in error.
I'm not terribly insufferable, but I can say I've met people who have argued that a 4.9 Ford is different from a 5.0. Those are crazy people, a book conflicts with reality and they still side with the books. I'm into what is reasonable, fair, and makes the most sense, not the details of technical superfluous crap.Are you one of those insufferable people who refuses to call a 302 a 5.0 because pushes up nerd glasses technically it's only 4942cc?
,,,bless their hearts.....the piston debate...
the problem with doing that is in an automotive application, they are a little light, because some moron out there is going to buy the lightest piston he can get and throw a 400 shot to it and torch a groove right down the side of it, then go after the manufacturer of the piston saying "it is junk design" while posting all over the net and farsebook about how bad they are.